221.157 Studio I (Lens) 221.157 Studio Notes Bachelor of Fine Arts

221.157 – Week #6.2 Notes

6th April, 2022

Final Presentation Day!

221.157 Studio I (Lens) 221.157 Studio Notes Bachelor of Fine Arts

221.157 – Week #6.1 Notes

4th April, 2022

Reminder, our images are to be…

…accompanied by a 150-word statement which addresses why you chose that location, and how the visual material you have collected or created with your camera has engaged with the concepts of mihimihi.

We went through what we’d produced.

So far, mine is a bit woolly and subjective. Wrong word. Melodramatic? Over-emotional?

Days Bay is known for being Wellington’s day out on the beach. For most of the year, however, it’s a sleepy commuter village.

In the height of Summer, I don’t find Days Bay to be a welcoming place. It feels crowded and full of strangers, and coming back home to it can be stressful. I find myself hurrying home. Conversely, in the quiet times I feel welcomes the moment I step off the ferry and onto the wharf. There is a palpable sense of relaxation, and I sense that in the other passengers too. I stop to enjoy my surroundings; I listen to the sea and the gulls.

With my images, I wanted to show the beauty of the bay outside the summer season. The beach, the bay, and the sea are an ever-changing inspiration to me. Subtle shifts in the weather can affect the sea and sky dramatically. Storms can bring things onto the beach – from jellyfish and seaweed to huge logs. The seasons and the time of day create subtle shifts in light.

So, Ginell helped me tune it a bit. That was helpful – need to better connect to the actual images.

Then, listened into what other people were trying, including writing one of these 150 word things from scratch, which went… OK, although would have been maybe three times too long. Editing seems to be far more important that writing with these things.

221.157 Studio I (Lens) 221.157 Studio Notes Bachelor of Fine Arts

221.157 – Week #5.2 Notes

31st March, 2022


This was actually a really good class – waaaay better than Monday.

Each member of the class showed a couple of their favourite photographers.

Looking forward to seeing the list of them all, so I can track down their work.

Such a great variety to get one’s teeth into!

221.157 Studio I (Lens) 221.157 Studio Notes Bachelor of Fine Arts

221.157 – Week #5.1 Notes

28th March, 2022

Group Feedback

Zoom School sucks.

Not a lot of structure.

Not a lot of conversation.

Each of these sessions costs about $75. It would be good to think that I’m getting $75 of value from them. Perhaps I’m treating University differently to most people, because it’s not just a badge collecting exercise so that I can then take the degree and parlay it into job. University needs to stretch me so that I grow as an artist, in this case as a photographer.

Anyway, enough of the self-pitying whines.

Where am I up to?

What I got from today’s session

Need to develop the theme of my images more, and build a connection.

Contact sheet so far

221.157 Studio I (Lens) 221.157 Studio Notes Bachelor of Fine Arts

221.157 – Week #4.2 Notes

24th March, 2022

More inspiration

221.157 Studio I (Lens) 221.157 Studio Notes Bachelor of Fine Arts

221.157 – Week #4.1 Notes

21st March, 2022

Critique Day

Took a look at everyone’s work.

Interesting to see what other people are up to.

Notes for my work

Perhaps stick to B&W or colour for coherence; best to avoid a mixture, unless it’s for effect, I guess?

Maybe go back to Camera Raw and try reworking into B&W or colour? Stick with the same crop.

Get the theme sorted out.

Build on the ideas from Sugimoto-san’s work? Get more water into them?

Stick with the lack of people.

Try some night shots?


Don’t know who took these, but pretty cool.

221.157 Studio I (Lens) 221.157 Studio Notes Bachelor of Fine Arts

221.157 – Week #3.2 Notes

17th March, 2022

Presentation Day

Presented on our David Bate assignment.

Watched everyone else presentations and gave feedback.


After the tutorial time wound up, I got interested in seascapes and looked at the work of other photographers.

Hiroshi Sugimoto

221.157 Studio I (Lens) 221.157 Studio Notes Bachelor of Fine Arts

221.157 – Week #3.1 Notes

14th March, 2022


Two tasks to complete:

  1. Choose two photos, examine, write-up.
  2. Language of photography (based on David Bate’s writing)

Then, wrap these into a presentation ready for class on Thursday.

Two Photos

This is a follow-up to last week’s activities. I chose the following:

  • Andreas Gursky | Selected Works – Rhine II.
  • Franco Fontana | Landscape (1978).

Rhine II

Andreas Gursky | Selected Works – Rhine II. Accessed 13 Mar. 2022.

Fontana, Landscape (1978)

Puglia 1978 | Franco Fontana | On Landscape. Accessed 14 Mar. 2022.



  • Natural light, overcast day.
  • Entire landscape is in focus.
  • Relatively fast shutter speed – river frozen in time, no motion blur.
  • Printed version on satin finish paper (Andreas Gursky, MOMA).
  • Very limited monochromatic colour palette – essentially green and grey.


  • Highly abstract
  • Framing feels irrelevant, like the river could go on forever.
  • Horizon is dominant – draws one’s eye.
  • Very linear – bands of colour.


  • Gursky shoots on 5 x 7 and 4×5 inch large-format cameras, before scanning his negatives to work on them digitally. Gursky uses 100 ASA Fuji film in two large-format Linhof cameras that are positioned side by side, one with a slight wide-angle lens, the other with a standard one. Exposure time: 1/8 of a second, f-stop 5.6 to 8. He needs this for depth of field, and the relatively low-speed film for the resolution. While any occasional blurred movement is discarded later in the process. He gains speed by underexposing the film stock one f-stop, and has it developed using push processing.
    ‘Andreas Gursky Is a German Photographer Known for His Linhof Camera.’ Anatomy Films Analog Photography, 18 Sept. 2018,
  • His process involved shooting chromogenic prints (or “c-prints”) with film, using a large-format 5 × 7-inch (12.7 × 17.8-cm) camera; he scanned the images and digitally retouched and manipulated them on a computer. In Rhein II (1999)—which is 5 × 10 feet (about 1.5 × 3 metres)—Gursky created a nonexistent section of the Rhine River.
    Andreas Gursky | German Photographer | Britannica. Accessed 13 Mar. 2022.


  • Desire for abstraction, and commentary on landscape free from human presence.
  • By joining photographs of different segments of the river, Gursky invented an entirely new landscape, free of industry and human presence.
    Andreas Gursky | German Photographer | Britannica. Accessed 13 Mar. 2022.



  • Natural light, bright sunshine.
  • Entire landscape is in focus.
  • Possible slow shutter speed, although no movement in field (maybe no wind)..
  • No access to print, so unsure of texture.
  • Limited colour palette – blue/yellow/white/black.


  • Highly abstract
  • Essentially frameless – composition continues on
  • Dominant horizon – the “island”
  • Very linear, bands of colour (cv Gursky)


  • No info on equipment – often seen with a Leica rangefinder, but recently also with high end Canon digital equipment.


  • Broke away from black and white as “fine art”; embraced colour.
  • Paring down landscapes to essentials.
  • Makes colour and texture primary elements.

Comparing the two images

  • Both break pretty much all of the unwritten rules of landscape photography/painting:
    • No “rule of thirds”.
    • No leading lines.
    • Little foreground interest.
    • No vanishing point.
    • No use of negative space.
    • No framing elements.
  • Strong horizon at the centre of the image.
  • Strong use of horizontal lines.
  • Very limited palette.
  • Little variation in light
  • Contrast comes through colour/shape..
  • No shadows.

My personal views

I very much dislike “traditional” landscape photography/painting. These two photographs are landscapes, but pared down to the absolute minimum. I like geometric and abstract photographic work, and enjoy how these images use landscape as the base for this.
Clearly I’m not the only one who values this approach: Rhine II sold for $4.3m.

Language of Photography

We split our group of six into two subgroups of three, then choose three of the following elements.

  1. Perspective
  2. Blur and movement
  3. Portraits, mood, and lighting
  4. Points of view
  5. Rhetoric – All groups must choose the Rhetoric task because it brings together the themes discussed in the essay.

Next step is to take photos to reflect these elements. Finally, present two or three photos per element to the whole class.

My group chose Portraits, Points of View, and Rhetoric.


221.157 Studio I (Lens) 221.157 Studio Notes Bachelor of Fine Arts

221.157 – Week #2.2 Notes

10th March, 2022

Show and tell


Ben showed his work.

Spends lots of time on the South coast of Wellington.

Shoots at night.

Very long duration photography.

Talk of reciprocity failure for film emulsions – hey, I remember that!


Shoots landscapes, mainly on the Central Plateau

Enjoys shooting before/after storms.

Balance between tramping/climbing and photography.

I was reminded of this: “Anything more than 500 yards from the car just isn’t photogenic.” – Edward Weston

Group Work

Got set up with 4 other people.

As always: friendly, clever, young people!

I shared a Google doco with my team.

We need to look at 2 photos each.

Probably connect with Instagram or something?

Looking down onto the Pavilion and water chute at Williams Park, Days Bay, Lower Hutt, Wellington, with the beachfront at the top right of the image. Photograph taken ca 1910s by Sydney Charles Smith. 
Water chute at Williams Park, Day’s Bay, circa 1900. Photographer unidentified. 
221.157 Studio I (Lens) 221.157 Studio Notes Bachelor of Fine Arts

221.157 – Week #2.1 Notes

7th March, 2022

Digital Workflow


  • Adobe Lightroom OK for individuals (we use Bridge as better on shared network).
  • Use Adobe Bridge
  • Import the RAW files from the camera.
  • Import as a DNG, which is a digital negative.


Remove lens aberrations first.

Remove chromatic aberrations.

Then get into editing the levels/channels.

The “Basic” tools

Develop your own workflow.

Assess the histogram.

e.g. work through the histogram and sliders in order?

Workflow (from Handout)

I borrowed this from the class notes:


  • Shoot in RAW files
  • Use manual settings to control exposure correctly
  • Downloading images
  • Download through Bridge
  • Convert RAW files to DNG as you download (check box)


  • Use Bridge to organise and manage your files
  • Make contact sheets of the WHOLE shoot, print and put into your workbook with notes about:
    • What you tried
    • What worked and what didn’t
    • What you plan to try next
  • Go through every shoot and mark the photos you are happier with – come up with your own system but perhaps mark photos you really like 5 stars and ones you think you like with 3 stars. This way when you come back you can easily sort them and only look at the photos you’re happier with.
  • Adjust the images you are happier with in Adobe Camera Raw (ACR)
    • At this stage global adjustments to get the white balance, crop/straightening and tonal adjustments right are enough
  • Once you have a smaller selection you might use the Contact Sheet function in ‘Output’ to print larger versions of some of the photos you’re happier with (perhaps 4 per page) and put these into your workbook with notes discussing them.
  • Repeat the above multiple times, assessing and refining your work as you go, developing your project and how you are communicating with your photographs.

To Do

  • Get to know Adobe CC, initially Bridge and Camera Raw.
  • Start to develop a workflow for myself that suits how I shoot. Historically, I tend to crop for form/shape before any retouching, but is this OK?
  • I’ve not worked with contact sheets before. How does this work? I’m assuming that there’s an automated tool for this.
Wellington City Council Archives, 00117-1-50
Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner